• 検索結果がありません。

証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "証券化市場の動向調査 | 日本証券業協会"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

May 31, 2016 Japan Securities Dealers Association Japanese Bankers Association

Securitization Market Trends Survey Report (Issuance Trends in Fiscal 2015)

This report is a summary of the results of the “Securitization Market Trends Survey” (see JSDA’s website at <http://www.jsda.or.jp/en/index.html>), conducted monthly by the Japan Securities Dealers Association (JSDA) and the Japanese Bankers Association (JBA), for fiscal 2015, the period from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016.

In addition, please refer to an attached sheet for the numerical data used in a chart.

I. Overall Issuance Trends for Securitization Products

Looking at the issuance trends for securitization products in the fiscal 2015, both the amount and number of issues increased year on year. The total issuance amount was ¥3,609.2 billion, increasing 36.3% from the fiscal 2014, while the number of issues was 125, up 0.8% year on year. This amount was the largest since fiscal 2009 (see Chart 1).

Chart 1. Securitization Product Issuance Amount and Number of Issues

Reference: The total issuance amount of corporate straight bonds

(¥trillion)

※ provisional figure

5.3

8.2

9.8

6.8

3.7

2.9 2.6 3.4 2.9 2.7 2.6 3.6

296 312 314 261 204 146 107 91 90

127 124 125

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

(issues)

Number of issues (right scale)

Issuance amount (left scale)

FY 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015※

amount

(2)

II. Issuance Trends by Underlying Assets

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount for the fiscal 2015 by underlying assets, the amount of “RMBS,” ”CMBS,” ”CDO,” ”Consumer loans,” “Shopping credits” and ”Sales receivables/Commercial bills” increased, whereas in contrast, “Leases” and “Others” decreased. Above all, the issuance amount of “RMBS” was the largest since fiscal 2008. In addition, “Shopping credits” increased for the fourth consecutive year (see Chart 2).

Chart 2. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Underlying Assets

RMBS CMBS CDO Leases Consumer loans

Shopping credits

Sales receivables/

Commercial bills

Others Total

Issu an c e amo u n t( \ 1 0 0 millio n ) 26,747 439 403 296 413 6,516 735 543 36,092 Ye ar o n ye ar c h an ge ( \ 1 0 0 millio n ) +8 ,3 6 2 +1 6 6 +3 4 9 ▲6 1 1 +3 4 8 +1 ,0 6 3 +1 5 4 ▲2 2 4 9,606 Ye ar o n ye ar c h an ge ( % ) +4 5 .5 +6 0 .6 +6 3 8 .3 ▲6 7 .4 +5 3 5 .4 +1 9 .5 +2 6 .4 ▲2 9 .2 +3 6 .3 %  Compos ition 74.1 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.1 18.1 2.0 1.5 100.0 Re f . N u mbe r o f issu e s( pre se n t FY) 40 4 6 3 2 49 16 5 125     〃         ( pre vio u s FY) 41 2 3 5 1 41 24 7 124

0 2 4 6 8 10

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

Others Foundation funds, subordinated-loan, business cash flow, medical receivables, and others

Sales receivables/Commercial bills Sales receivables, commercial bills

(3)

III. Issuance Trends by Product Type

Looking at the securitization product issuance amount (¥3,609.2 billion) by product type, the amount of “Bonds” was ¥1,970.2 billion (54.6% of the total), followed by “Trust beneficiary rights” with ¥1,518.0 billion (42.1%) (see Chart 3).

Chart 3. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Product Type

IV. Issuance Trends by Repayment Method

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥3,609.2 billion) by repayment method, the amount of “Pass-through repayments” was ¥3,148.0 billion (87.2% of the total) (see Chart 4).

Chart 4. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

0 2 4 6 8 10

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

0 2 4 6 8 10

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

Others

Bonds

Trust beneficiary rights

Not noted

Installment repayments

Lump sum repayments at maturity

(4)

V. Issuance Trends by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥3,609.2 billion) by planned/average term to maturity, the amount of “Not noted” was ¥3,424.9 billion (94.9% of the total), followed by “1 years to 3 years” with ¥114.4 billion (3.2%) and “3 year to 5 years” with ¥52.3 billion (1.4%) (see Chart 5).

Chart 5. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Planned/Average Term to Maturity

VI. Issuance Trends by Credit Rating

Looking at the securitization issuance amount (¥3,609.2 billion) by credit rating, the amount of “AAA” was ¥3,042.9 billion (84.3% of the total) (see Chart 6).

Chart 6. Securitization Product Issuance Amount by Credit Rating

0 2 4 6 8 10

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

6 8 10

(¥trillion)

Not noted

7 ye ars o r ฀more 5 years to 7 years

3 years to 5 years

1 year to 3 years

Under 1 year

Not noted Short-term rating

CCC

BB

(5)

<supplementary information>

(ⅰ)RMBS Issuance Trends by Originator

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥2,674.7 billion) by originator, the amount of “Japan Housing Finance Agency” (JHF) was ¥1,875.3 billion (70.1% of the total), followed by “Others” with ¥637.6 billion (23.8%) (see Chart ⅰ).

Chart ⅰ. RMBS Issuance Amount by Originator

(ⅱ)RMBS Issuance Trends by Product Type

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥2,674.7 billion) by product type, the amount of “Bonds” was ¥1,875.3 billion (70.1% of the total) followed by “Trust beneficiary rights” with ¥799.4 billion (29.9%) (see Chart ⅱ).

Chart ⅱ. RMBS Issuance Amount by Product Type

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

Others

Nonbanks

Regional banks

Commercial /trust banks

Japan Housing Finance Agency

Others

Bonds

Trust beneficiary rights

(6)

(ⅲ)RMBS Issuance Trends by Repayment Method

Looking at the RMBS issuance amount (¥2,674.7 billion) by repayment method, all repayments were “Pass-through repayments” (see Chart ⅲ).

Chart ⅲ. RMBS Issuance Amount by Repayment Method

(ⅳ)Launch Spread at Issuance (JHF Monthly MBS)

The launch spread (the spread between the coupon rate of “JHF Monthly MBS” and the yield of the most recently priced 10-year reference JGB) for “JHF Monthly MBS” gradually expanded from July 2015, while contracted in March 2016 (see Chart ⅳ).

Chart ⅳ. JHF Monthly RMBS Launch Spread

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

FY2004 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

(¥trillion)

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

1.3 (%)

S Series

Monthly RMBS

Not noted

Installment repayments

Lump sum repayments at maturity

参照

関連したドキュメント

He thereby extended his method to the investigation of boundary value problems of couple-stress elasticity, thermoelasticity and other generalized models of an elastic

Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,

自動車販売会社(2社) 自動車 自動車販売拠点設備 1,547 自己資金及び借入金 三菱自動車ファイナンス株式会社 金融 システム投資 他

Amount of Remuneration, etc. The Company does not pay to Directors who concurrently serve as Executive Officer the remuneration paid to Directors. Therefore, “Number of Persons”

As a result of the Time Transient Response Analysis utilizing the Design Basis Ground Motion (Ss), the shear strain generated in the seismic wall that remained on and below the

Lower Losses Power Semi’s Optimal Topologies Capacitors Thermal Design Magnetics.

電気事業会計規則に基づき、当事業年度末において、「原子力損害賠償補償契約に関する法律(昭和36年6月 17日

2.「注記事項 重要な会計方針 6.引当金の計上基準 (3)災害損失引当金 追加情報